Yeah. No subtlety for this rant. I just told you what to do. Why? Cuz it's AWESOME. Well, seeing old movies in the theater is AWESOME. Me telling you what to do, like a complete jerk, is REALLY AWESOME. :)
Seriously though, especially if you're into action/adventure/comic book/fantasy/sci-fi/geeky stuff like me, the movies in that genre, especially from the 80s, were MEANT to be seen on gigantic movie screens. Remember, studios were not totally sold on the VHS industry in the early 80s. It took awhile for that to even be a consideration for production. Now of course everything that gets made has DVD/Blu-Ray consideration for watchability and sales projections but this was NOT the case back in the day and it shows. The movies were made for the theaters and production was done accordingly.
Not meant for 15-inch screens
Matte paintings, models and miniatures have a life-likeness to them that modern film audiences either totally missed out on or can't remember. Movies where there was a lot of physical art involved in the creation of the shots just stand out that much more in a cinema than on a screen the size of a book. I really felt this when I saw Raiders Of The Lost Ark last year and Batman this past week (thank you, Arclight). I've seen both of those movies a zillion times on televisions but the cinema experience really lends something to the type of film that was created. The sound was amazing, too. The balance between dialogue, foley and music on a television or computer doesn't even come close to a theater experience and only THE BEST home theater systems can even try to do it justice in your living room.
I wonder if there's a way to bring some of the feel of these physical aspects back to movies. CGI artists may get there eventually but there's still a ways to go. Even the super high-budget movies like Avengers that look absolutely great on movie screens and on Blu-Rays aren't the same. There's a lightning fast pace to the editing and effects processing that makes these movies look like commercials and video games more than films. There are lighting issues too, maybe because so much stuff is moving and changing colors on these screens now. And of course, there's the sound. Film sound hasn't gotten quite as crazy as music production with the loudness of everything but it does get lost without a home theater setup.
I wonder if there's a way to bring some of the feel of these physical aspects back to movies. CGI artists may get there eventually but there's still a ways to go. Even the super high-budget movies like Avengers that look absolutely great on movie screens and on Blu-Rays aren't the same. There's a lightning fast pace to the editing and effects processing that makes these movies look like commercials and video games more than films. There are lighting issues too, maybe because so much stuff is moving and changing colors on these screens now. And of course, there's the sound. Film sound hasn't gotten quite as crazy as music production with the loudness of everything but it does get lost without a home theater setup.
Only one building blows up and the movie still works
Ok, I'm gonna try to stop sounding like grandpa talking about the good old days and these young whippersnappers not knowing what good quality is now (I figure that'll happen around Random Rant #258 anyway). I would like to ask the filmmaking community if there is a way to marry some of this new technology (certainly the digital artistry and lighting designs like we saw in Tron: Legacy) with still craftsmanship that you'd find in model work and matte paintings. Yeah, there's always costumes and props but I'm talking about major action sequences and location shots as well. With a new Star Wars trilogy on the way, this kind of innovation can pay off BIG in the near future.
Disney, please no more bad aliens, fake backgrounds and pastel tones
I believe that younger audiences will get something cool out of this if they're exposed to the physical artwork in some familiar context. Then they could learn to appreciate the older technology if they don't already. The crowd that's longer in the tooth will also go to more movies if they feel like the movies are watchable as films and not just a 125-minute+ CGI video games with actors. Since the older audience usually has money and families to bring to these movies anyway, why not give it a shot? If the film industry is doing as well as we're being told, why not take a risk? If nothing else, this move can revitalize some of these older film properties and bring more revenue to the table as nostalgia kicks in and new fans are brought into the fold.
There, I just told the movie industry what to do, too. Now that I'm done telling everyone else what to do, better get back to my job.
RLRR LRLL.....
